Carbon Dioxide.

The danger of carbon dioxide is probably the most pernicious manufactured paradigm humanity has ever seen. All plants need carbon dioxide, plants make oxygen, people need oxygen and people produce carbon dioxide. Reducing Co2 will eventually reduce oxygen levels, if anyone asks me if I'd like more or less Co2 in the atmosphere, I'll take more thanks, sorry if you don't like that, my answer is based on actual research and a little thinking:
We all know the picture painted below, it equals people are bad and is setting the stage to control humanity to an extreme degree. Rising Co2 levels will mostly aid small farmers, smallholders and wood fuel producers, I suggest that the demonization of Co2 is part of a covert warfare operation on the self sufficient and a global population control facility in the making. That 700 scientists would endorse the phrase "Uncertainty is no excuse for complacency" is completely untenable and an insult to articulate thinking persons worldwide.

Syracuse Herald 1990.

Most people think that newspapers are "Of the People and For the People". They are in fact a facility for providing information or propaganda and if you work for a newspaper you will comply with the narratives created by its owners. These narratives portrayed in newspapers all seem very convincing but often the statistics are tampered with and the science is contrived. When people suggest I should trust "The Science", I ask is that the science that created the atom bomb?. It's important to remember that certain people make bombs, guns, poison gas and all manner of nasty things, including in the wrong hands, the printing press. People who think the creators of such evil weapons wouldn't lie to them are a little naive.

Roofgarden and Restaurant Manhattan Project Coming Soon The New Woodsman book by Tom Barron 1921 Heat Carbon Dioxide Serapeum of Saqqara Building 7 Weather Modification Global Cooling Climate Change Controlling with fear of illness Petroleum US airbases in UK Y2K Operation Paperclip Nazis in Antarctica Operation Highjump UFOs over Washington 1952 Water Fluoridation MK Ultra Vance Packard Reception Area Ground Floor Basements and Boiler Rooms

Svante Arrhenius is generally credited with the carbon dioxide equals warming hypothesis, he believed less co2 would make it colder and also that humans came from outer space (probably his most accurate assessment) and that childen grew taller and more intelligent by being electrified. It might even be true but would be considered highly eccentric today. Greta Thunberg is Arrhenius's Great Granddaughter, it makes the idea that she's just a normal kid from a family with no investment in the Co2 warming narrative a little hard to believe, though it would seem they don't often mention the electrifying children episode. We can see that Arrhenius was a racist and an advocate of population control, so one would suppose that if "electrifying" children made them sterile, it would be considered a bonus. Perhaps?.

Chicago Examiner 1912.
Please zoom in to read text.

New York Times 1912.

Normally I'm a fan of Nikola Tesla. They hoped it would help do away with the use of bromides, peptins, phosphates and all kinds of other drugs used for nervous and digestive disorders in children.

NASA website 2016.

According to NASA mans activities are greening the planet. This, to me , seems believable though I treat much of what NASA says with scepticism. Some newspapers have turned this information into propaganda by claiming it's only in the Polar Regions where there aren't many trees anyway. Like the article below which, in its frustration, attempts to insult those who question "The Consensus" on climate. The only real consensus here, is that we all need money and some journalists will say anything to get some.

Maccallen Monitor 2016.

But never let an opportunity to build big machines and seek funding for "saving the planet" pass you by. It's unfortunate to realize that some people would advocate covering the planet with these machines, not in the name of real science, health or happiness, but of contrived science, financial incentive and control freakery. It seems curious to me that so far The Brewing and Baking Industries have not been demonized, they both produce Co2 but seem to have been left out of the propaganda for the time being. Perhaps because at some future point The Controlling Interests would like an excuse to deprive us all of a nice pint of beer and a loaf of bread. If after reading all this you are still convinced that rising Co2 levels are going to cause catastrophic global warming, might I suggest a little electrification. It may also make you taller.

This machine and the half a square mile of them in the background, supposedly for sucking Co2 out of the atmosphere have, in my mind, all the makings of an elaborate hoax.